Reflection
Light returns from the surface or scatters back out of the skin.
HELIO / THE LIGHT GUIDE / 01
What happens when red and near-infrared light meet your body? Follow the light from your skin to your cells, then explore how to use your panel.
A practical guide / Built around the HELIO 2027 collection
01 / LIGHT & SKIN
Red and near-infrared light can influence how cells work. This is called photobiomodulation, or PBM. The first step happens at your skin.
Some light bounces back. Some is absorbed. Some travels farther into the tissue. [1]
Light returns from the surface or scatters back out of the skin.
Molecules in the tissue take up the light’s energy.
Light passes through one tissue layer and into the next.
Inside the skin, light changes direction as it meets different structures. This is scattering. The wavelength and the tissue together shape how far light travels. [1]
02 / THE SPECTRUM
Wavelength shapes both tissue penetration and cellular response. Explore how the HELIO spectrum brings together mitochondrial activity, nitric oxide, redox and calcium signalling, and water-mediated mechanisms.
LEDs emit a band around each wavelength. Solid curves use supplier chip peak and bandwidth measurements; dashed 630/670 nm curves are estimates. Multiple curves at 850 and 1060 nm show different tested samples. Shapes are simplified and heights normalized, not relative panel output. Markers show nominal wavelengths.
RED / VISIBLE
630 nm adds a shorter-red component for skin and connective tissue. Research in skin cells and mouse skin recorded increased type-I collagen and reduced MMP-1, an enzyme that breaks collagen down. This connects cellular light responses with the balance between collagen production and breakdown. [26] ↗
660 nm sits close to CCO’s red absorption band around 655 nm, linking this wavelength to mitochondrial energy metabolism. Laboratory research recorded increased ATP and cell growth, including in cells without functional CCO. Skin studies also found increased procollagen, connecting cellular energy responses with tissue renewal. [17] ↗ [4] ↗ [27] ↗
Among HELIO’s red wavelengths, 670 nm lies closest to the approximately 668 nm cellular-response peak reported in laboratory research. Cell measurements also identified a nearby absorption band around 665 nm linked to CCO. It also releases nitric oxide from haemoglobin and myoglobin in laboratory experiments. This signalling molecule is involved in blood-vessel relaxation, adding a vascular pathway alongside research on mitochondrial energy production. [18] ↗ [22] ↗ [12] ↗
NEAR-INFRARED / INVISIBLE
810 nm combines tissue transmission with activity in CCO’s near-infrared absorption band. Cell studies recorded changes in ATP, mitochondrial membrane potential, calcium and reactive oxygen species (ROS). These are linked parts of cellular signalling: energy production, stress responses and regulation of gene activity. [17] ↗ [16] ↗ [15] ↗
830 nm sits close to CCO’s near-infrared absorption peak around 835 nm. Its research also extends to nitric-oxide and inflammatory signalling. In human fibroblast cultures, 830 nm increased nitric oxide and cell growth while reducing selected inflammatory markers. Fibroblasts build the connective-tissue matrix, including collagen. [17] ↗ [28] ↗
850 nm broadens the near-infrared band alongside 810 and 830 nm. Human forearm research with an 850 nm laser recorded increases in oxygenated haemoglobin and oxidized CCO. These measurements connect oxygen availability in tissue with mitochondrial redox activity—the electron-transfer reactions involved in cellular energy production. [13] ↗
1060 nm adds longer-wave near-infrared, with lower scattering and greater water absorption than 810–850 nm. Its rationale includes proposed water-mediated mechanisms involving interfacial and exclusion-zone (EZ) water and cellular energy. At nearby 1064 nm, LED research in human stem cells identified a TRPV1 ion-channel pathway involving calcium and redox signalling, with increased cell growth. [20] ↗ [21] ↗ [23] ↗ [29] ↗ [31] ↗
These pathways overlap across wavelengths. CCO = cytochrome c oxidase; ATP = the cell’s energy carrier. Five wavelengths in i-series and HELIO-series. Seven in pro-series.
03 / INSIDE THE CELL
See how light interacts with the parts of a cell that produce energy. Add light, then explore each step.
Cells are already producing ATP.
Light is on. Follow the red particles.
RESEARCH IN PEOPLE
A controlled trial measured smoother skin, fewer fine lines and greater collagen density after repeated red-light treatments. Results depend on the treatment protocol. [5]
A 48-person crossover trial measured higher morning heart-rate variability after whole-body PBM and exercise. Cycling performance and perceived recovery were unchanged. [6]
04 / DOSE & DISTANCE
The biological response to light depends on more than wavelength. Intensity and exposure time determine the dose reaching the skin, but equal doses delivered over different durations can produce different responses. That is why intensity, time and dose need to be considered together. [7]
A STARTING POINT / DISTANCE USE
Moderate intensity at the skin
Aim for 15 minutes to start
Explore both settings below. The total is useful, but intensity and time each matter.
Total RED + NIR at your chosen distance, not the percentage on the screen.
Prefer 10–20 minutes; 15 is our starting example. Shorter settings are here for comparison.
LIGHT REACHING THE SKIN
J/cm²
mW/cm² × seconds ÷ 1000
Energy reaching each square centimetre of skin with continuous light. Absorbed tissue dose will differ.
A MODERATE STARTING EXAMPLE
25 mW/cm² for 15 minutes gives 22.5 J/cm². This sits within the illustrated 20–30 J/cm² range without rushing the session.
For context: a small whole-body study used 24 mW/cm² for 14 minutes (20.2 J/cm²). This is a reference point, not a universal target. [24]
The “switch” idea treats light as a signal that starts a biological response, rather than simply energy to accumulate. GembaRed uses this idea to explain why a brighter, shorter session may not reproduce a gentler, longer one. It is a useful hypothesis, not a proven ten-minute threshold.
A human study by Powner and Glen Jeffery used 670 nm at 40 mW/cm² for 15 minutes. It tested a specific metabolic response, not the minimum or ideal session length. Our 15-minute example is a practical distance-use starting point; effective research protocols also include shorter exposures.
For this HELIO distance-use guide, 50 mW/cm² is the upper limit, not a level to aim for. Start in the moderate 20–35 mW/cm² range and adjust output or distance. More light does not reliably mean a better response.
This is a conservative guide setting, not a universal safety boundary or a clinically established optimum. Wavelength, tissue and the purpose of treatment change the relevant protocol. [7]
Moving farther away generally lowers intensity and spreads light over more skin. Beams from neighbouring LEDs overlap. Use measurements at your working distance; do not estimate intensity from a simple inverse-square rule near a panel. [8]
Compare readings at the same distance with a meter calibrated for the wavelengths in use. Uncorrected solar meters can overstate LED intensity. A screen setting of 25% does not mean 25 mW/cm² at your skin. [9]
For broad-area distance use with continuous light. Follow your model’s manual and use the separate Contact presets for skin-contact sessions. Reduce output or stop if the light feels uncomfortably warm.
05 / DISTANCE & CONTACT
STANDARD
At a distance, light from neighbouring LEDs overlaps across a wider area. Increasing the gap generally spreads the light over more skin and lowers irradiance at the surface. Position therefore changes both coverage and dose.
Protective eyewear supplied.
CONTACT
Contact is the most effective way to deliver light deep into the body. It addresses the optical barriers between the light source and the target tissue.
Optical coupling. A closely coupled optical window replaces the air–skin boundary with a smaller refractive-index mismatch. Fresnel reflection falls, allowing a larger fraction of incident photons to enter tissue. Absorption and scattering then determine the energy available at depth. [8]
Mechanical optical clearing. Compression-based contact techniques add another mechanism: local pressure thins tissue and redistributes superficial blood and interstitial water. This shortens the optical path and changes absorption and scattering; experiments have measured increased transmission. This effect requires tissue compression, beyond skin contact alone. [8]
Targeted delivery. HELIO pairs red and near-infrared wavelengths with dedicated Contact presets for intensity, pulse parameters and exposure time. Use Contact for targeted delivery beneath the skin; use distance for broader coverage.
Use the settings for your chosen mode. On Contact days, reduce or skip a full distance session on the same area.
06 / MAKE SPACE FOR LIGHT
Different positions expose different areas of the body.
Setup & session settings ↗01
Optimized for:
Even Exposure
02
Optimized for:
Hydrated Fascia
03
Optimized for:
Ritual Embeddedness
04
Optimized for:
Comfort & Multitasking
For use at a distance: secure the panel and keep vents clear. Wear the supplied protective eyewear; never look directly into the LEDs. Stop for irritation or uncomfortable heat.
KEEP EXPLORING
Studies and practical reading behind this guide. Open a title to learn more.
A laser study in 30 volunteers comparing how 660 and 830 nm light travel through tissue.
Read source ↗In isolated mitochondria, 810 nm increased ATP production at selected power and time settings.
Read source ↗Lab-grown cells responded to 660 nm even without CCO, an enzyme involved in cellular energy production.
Read source ↗Measurements of skin roughness, fine lines and collagen density.
Read source ↗Recovery markers and cycling performance in 48 participants.
Read source ↗Why light intensity and session length need to be considered together.
Read source ↗Zhang et al. describe Fresnel reflection at an optically coupled interface. Kampa et al. measured approximately three times more transmitted power with contact than with a 1 cm gap through about 14.38 mm of skin and muscle in living dogs, using an 830 nm laser. This was a transmission measurement, not a comparison of clinical outcomes.
Joensen et al. found that contact effects varied with laser-probe geometry. Vogt et al., Gurjarpadhye et al. and Lim et al. investigated tissue deformation, water redistribution and pressure-dependent blood and scattering changes. Compression-based optical clearing requires actual tissue deformation.
These studies explain the optical principles behind contact delivery. They do not measure HELIO panel transmission, establish compression from its non-protruding convex lenses, or demonstrate that HELIO produces superior clinical outcomes.
GembaRed / The superior optics of skin contact ↗Zhang et al. (2019) / Refractive index & Fresnel reflection ↗Kampa et al. (2020) / Contact & distance transmission at 830 nm ↗Joensen et al. (2012) / Probe geometry & contact transmission ↗Vogt et al. (2012) / Light transmission & scattering ↗Gurjarpadhye et al. (2011) / Compression & water content ↗Lim et al. (2011) / Probe pressure & tissue optics ↗A practical test of the Tenmars TM-206 solar meter.
Read source ↗Understanding study methods, settings and results.
Read source ↗Ryu et al. (2023). How cultured human tendon cells multiplied and moved after 630 nm LED light.
Read source ↗Wong-Riley et al. (2005). Different wavelengths changed CCO activity and ATP levels in cultured nerve cells.
Read source ↗Pruitt et al. (2022). Measurements on human forearms tracked oxidized CCO and oxygen-rich blood after light exposure, including 850 and 1064 nm lasers.
Read source ↗Huang et al. (2013). With 810 nm light, reactive oxygen molecules (ROS) rose in normal cultured mouse nerve cells and fell in stressed cells. Voltage across the inner mitochondrial membrane increased in both.
Read source ↗Chen et al. (2011). In cultured mouse connective-tissue cells, 810 nm triggered ROS and activated NF-κB, a protein that controls gene activity. Antioxidants suppressed this signal.
Read source ↗Sharma et al. (2011). Cultured mouse nerve cells responded differently to different amounts of 810 nm light. ATP, calcium, ROS and mitochondrial voltage were measured; more light did not always give a larger response.
Read source ↗Mason et al. (2014). In CCO purified from bovine hearts, light absorption appeared near 655 nm at the oxidized heme–copper centre (heme a₃/CuB) and peaked near 835 nm at the oxidized copper centre (CuA).
Read source ↗Karu et al. (2005). Cultured HeLa cells showed a red absorption peak near 665 nm. The 650–680 nm region was linked to relatively oxidized CCO; oxygen availability changed the absorption pattern.
Read source ↗Karu et al. (2004). Cell attachment showed peaks near 620, 680, 760 and 820–830 nm in cultured HeLa cells. These peaks describe a cell response. The proposed links to CCO came from comparing spectra.
Read source ↗Hale & Querry (1973). Water absorbs little red light. At 1060 nm, it absorbs less than at the nearby 970 nm band, but more than at 630 or 810–850 nm.
Read source ↗Tseng et al. (2009). Skin measurements in 18 people with skin types I–VI showed how blood, skin pigment, water and scattering together shape the path of light.
Read source ↗Lohr et al. (2009). In lab solutions, 670 nm released the signalling molecule nitric oxide (NO) from blood and muscle proteins — hemoglobin and myoglobin. The work also included animal heart tissue.
Read source ↗Chai, Yoo & Pollack (2009). Light expanded a particle-exclusion zone in water next to a hydrophilic material, with wavelength-dependent responses. This model experiment underpins research into light, interfacial water and charge separation; its strongest response was at 3100 nm.
Read source ↗Bowen & Arany (2023). Seven participants used whole-body 660 + 850 nm light at 24 mW/cm² for 14 minutes — 20.2 J/cm² per session. Sessions took place three times a week for four weeks in this small, unblinded study.
Read source ↗Diez et al. (2004). Measurements of individual ATP-synthase molecules showed how proton flow turns their tiny rotor while they make ATP, the cell’s energy carrier.
Read source ↗Kim et al. (2016). Research using 630 nm LEDs in human dermal fibroblasts and mouse skin examined collagen production and MMP-1. Type-I collagen increased and MMP-1 decreased.
Read source ↗Barolet et al. (2009). A pulsed 660 nm LED protocol increased type-I procollagen and reduced MMP-1 in reconstructed skin. A split-face clinical study recorded improvements in wrinkles and surface roughness.
Read source ↗Houreld et al. (2010). An 830 nm laser increased NO and cell proliferation and reduced TNF-α and IL-1β in a cultured human fibroblast model of diabetic wounds.
Read source ↗Sommer, Haddad & Fecht (2015). At 670 nm, illumination reduced interfacial viscous friction on model hydrophilic surfaces. The authors propose that reduced resistance around ATP synthase offers another mechanism for light-induced ATP production.
Read source ↗GembaRed explains overlapping wavelength bands and mechanisms, including CCO, nitric oxide, water and ion channels, with links to the underlying research.
Read source ↗Wavelength equivalence guide ↗Tong et al. (2025). In cultured human meniscus-derived stem cells, 1064 nm LED exposure increased calcium, reactive oxygen species and cell proliferation at selected doses. Blocking TRPV1 reduced these responses. CCO activity and nitric-oxide concentration remained unchanged.
Read source ↗HELIO / DESIGNED FOR REAL LIFE
Choose the coverage that fits your routine — from a compact tabletop panel to a full-body setup. Explore the sizes, or talk to us about a panel and stand for your space.